I guess there’s times in life where you just have to decide who it is you’d rather be sued by.
Imagine putting yourself in a position precarious enough that you can clearly see that, no matter what you do, somebody’s going to come at you with civil litigation.
Then, and simply for the point of making an argument, what if you were to put the corporation you work for in that precarious position?
At least to me, and I’m often alone in my thinking, none of anything above strikes me as good business, personal, corporate, or anything in between.
Getting sued, one way or another, is generally an indicator that something’s gone wrong, that somebody or group of somebodies messed up, that a grievance ensued, a grievance whose only remedy is cash.
The Town of Renfrew has signed an Information Technology (IT) service-provision contract with a company called OnServe, who by all accounts is a straight-up legitimate choice for the job had the award not been called into question, not by anything they did or might have done, but rather for the potentially and possibly fatally-flawed process that was utilized by town staff in awarding the contract in the first place.
That was a three-year contract worth approximately $85,000/year, which roughly extends out to $235,000 over the course of the deal.
Continue reading “RENFREW’S IT DEBACLE”