DEPLETED COUNCIL CENSURES TWO MEMBERS

I’m a private citizen and, as such, am not shackled by the self-serving conditions of any so-called Code of Conduct as drawn up by the very class of people who wish to perform their collective duty in the shadows and remain impervious to outside observation and commentary.

As with most of what I have thus-far witnessed in municipal politics, we have a group of professionals who have the ability and the capacity, even the willingness, to draw up a set of rules that protects themselves from any meaningful scrutiny or complaint.  They can set up a procedural regime that cloaks them from any criticism that may arise from their own handling, or even mishandling of a file, or a project within their area of jurisdictional responsibility.

I’m all in favour of professional respect and professional confidence.  I know the full, yet often idealistic value of consensus.  And I have seen governments and legislatures at work.  Respect and confidence are two pillars that work with others to support the onerous, yet necessary, weight of democracy, local or otherwise.

But, does Council really speak with one voice?  Can Council truly speak with one voice?  For example, do they speak with one voice when Strong Mayor powers are employed, overriding the voices of everyone else in the room?

Continue reading “DEPLETED COUNCIL CENSURES TWO MEMBERS”

POILIEVRE. AGAIN

How do I talk about Pierre Poilievre without sounding like, well, Pierre Poilievre?

I started this article on Friday and tossed it in my trash bin Saturday morning, mostly because of the tone I was taking, and because I had let him get under my skin again.  So I walked away.

Maybe I should just have confidence in my fellow Canadians to discern for themselves what kind of person he is.  And maybe they already have.  Maybe that’s why he’s not prime minister.  

But that said, he’s not gone.  Not yet.  Not by a long shot.

Continue reading “POILIEVRE. AGAIN”

MAYOR SIDNEY TO TAKE LEAVE OF ABSENCE

Under the Municipal Act, a member of a municipal council can take a leave of absence for a period of three months and still be able to retain their seat on Council.

So it is for Mayor Tom Sidney, who announced Thursday afternoon that he was taking just such a leave to attend to family matters.  The leave takes effect after the mayor concludes his duties today, Friday October 10, and will extend to December 12, 2025.

Continue reading “MAYOR SIDNEY TO TAKE LEAVE OF ABSENCE”

COUNCIL KEPT OUT OF LOOP ON CAO PERFORMANCE REVIEW

“Ooops, my bad.”

While not a direct quote of Mayor Tom Sidney’s, it still sort of captures his communication with Council about his lack of communication with Council.

As in he dropped the ball, and apologizes for the oversight, both statements that can, in fact be attributed to the mayor.

This is all about the performance review of the Chief Administrative Officer Gloria Raybone, the CAO hired by Council as a whole some months ago to bring in some direction to an otherwise seemingly moribund ship.  Evidently there’s this minor annoyance of needing to have her position confirmed, as if these past several months were some sort of probationary period.  It’s a pro-forma thing, just part of a regular protocol, a regular part of the hiring process.

Continue reading “COUNCIL KEPT OUT OF LOOP ON CAO PERFORMANCE REVIEW”

A MEETING GETS CANCELLED. OR POSTPONED.

Some might characterize it as being taken to task.  Others might say it was more like being taken to the woodshed.

Whatever your choice, it amounts to pretty much the same thing, as the mayor (Tom Sidney) and the CAQ (Gloria Raybone) were both on the hot seat at the beginning of last Tuesday’s meeting of Renfrew Town Council. 

The accountability piece in question had to do with the mayor cancelling the scheduled Council Meeting for September 9, the reasons given at the time being there were too many questions expected to come forward, and the staff needed additional time to prepare responses for those anticipated questions.

Continue reading “A MEETING GETS CANCELLED. OR POSTPONED.”

MA-TE-WAY IS DONE. EXCEPT FOR HAVING TO PAY FOR IT

If you were looking for blood in the water, or a pound of flesh, then you’re likely a little on the disappointed side.

The Ma-Te-Way issue, the one where a construction project not just doubled, but essentially tripled in cost?  It’s now officially closed, in all aspects, nothing more to be seen here, everybody move along.

And if you were looking for criminal culpability, put those desires away too, because the OPP has now announced that there will be no criminal charges levied against any of the actors involved in the biggest financial imbroglio to ever wash up on the banks of the mighty Bonnechere.

It’s done.

Continue reading “MA-TE-WAY IS DONE. EXCEPT FOR HAVING TO PAY FOR IT”

COUNCIL TAKES A POWDER ON TWO CITIZEN EMAILS

Semantics, sophistry, and a bag of pretzels.

This was the response Councillor John McDonald received when he suggested that staff ought to be compelled to respond to emails sent by residents for information or explanation.

Councillor McDonald was specifically referring to two emails, one sent by a Rose Curley and another by Charlene Riopelle, the former asking about procurement policies for capital projects and the latter having to do with Ma-Te-Way.

You should have seen them twisting in their seats.

But seat-twisting aside, Councillor McDonald was slapped-down in his request, for a number of reasons, some of them patently absurd.

Continue reading “COUNCIL TAKES A POWDER ON TWO CITIZEN EMAILS”

STRUCTURED TOWN HALL PLANNED FOR MID-OCTOBER

It’ll be two sessions, one starting mid-morning, the other at maybe 5 PM.  Both sessions being limited to a maximum of four hours, since gatherings like these qualify as official council “meetings” and are therefore required to adhere to the procedural rules listed in Clerk Carolynn Errett’s Little Red Book of Municipal Procedure, available at fine bookstores nowhere.  

That shouldn’t amount to any sort of problem, because, honestly, four hours is more than enough for an exercise in transparency and accountability, as well as simply putting faces to the various political and staff positions that are behind the day-to-day workings of the Corporation of the Town of Renfrew.  Offering two such gatherings is, in my mind, more than generous, so I applaud the effort to hold an event such as this, to close any gaps between the citizens/taxpayers and the staff and political types who govern their municipal affairs.

I’m talking about what has been referred to as a Structured Town Hall, where residents can come out to learn more about how they’re governed and to provide some measure of background to various points of concern and/or curiosity people may have with policy, policy direction, decision-making, and all the other stuff that’s part of running a town, or any other place for that matter.

Continue reading “STRUCTURED TOWN HALL PLANNED FOR MID-OCTOBER”

DEGRADATION OF LOCAL DEMOCRACY

Democracy is a frail and fragile thing.  In fact, it’s absolutely precarious, something we’re seeing all over the world, and, perhaps most noteworthy and alarming, right next door in the great republic to the south.

But democracy is imperilled here in Canada as well, and yes, it clings to life right here in Renfrew, where municipal mandarins and an either weak or complicit, perhaps even incompetent mayor team together to deny democratic process in municipal government.  

Owing to its fragile nature, it’s not terribly difficult for empire builders to trample all over its basic tenets, and people with personal or ambitious agendas represent the greatest threat to democracy, here and everywhere.

Continue reading “DEGRADATION OF LOCAL DEMOCRACY”

TOO MANY QUESTIONS

Too many questions.

That was the main reason cited by Renfrew’s mayor to explain his decision to “postpone” the regular meeting of Renfrew Town Council scheduled for this past September 9, 2025.  A decision made a couple of hours before puck drop.

Too many questions?

One has to wonder from whom, as in who has all these questions that brings the town to an abrupt halt, not so much in a functional day-to-day manner, but in the way things like democratic responsibility, democratic process, transparency, and accountability are handled, and by extension, respected.

Continue reading “TOO MANY QUESTIONS”

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑