LOVING YOUR CYBERTRUCK WHEN NOBODY ELSE DOES

That Tesla Cybertruck is truly something to behold.

It appears that more and more of them are out and about in the wild, so sightings of this futuristic beast are becoming more commonplace.  In fact, there’s even a couple in town.

I have to confess I have no idea what it must be like to own and operate one of these vehicles, with their supposed bullet-proof glass, a feature that I’m sure Elon Musk has included in all his personal vehicles, or at least the ones he shuttles around in.  I can’t say whether the vehicle could stop an RPG — Rocket-Propelled Grenade — but I did see Musk himself shatter the window with a rock in an attempt to prove that you can’t shatter the window with a rock.

And honestly, when it comes to rocks, why waste them on the truck when you could be flinging them at Elon himself, easily the most loathed man in the world, which is a hell of a statement when you consider some of the people who walk this planet at the same time that he does.  So why smash on the monster when you can get your licks in on Dr. Frankenstein instead?

Continue reading “LOVING YOUR CYBERTRUCK WHEN NOBODY ELSE DOES”

EMPLOYEE MONITORING / RIGHT TO DISCONNECT

Technology plays a huge role in just about any endeavour, and that holds true with the administration of corporations and how they go about their day-to-day business.

It’s not just limited to correspondence, financial spreadsheets, word and number processing, and the creation of snappy graphs and other visuals for presentations.  Technology also has a significant role in the area of property and employee management and supervision.

It may sound a little Orwellian, a bit Big Brotherish, as in the novel 1984, and it kind of is, but it’s also kind of necessary given the number of employees and the number of tasks those employees are charged with carrying out.

Continue reading “EMPLOYEE MONITORING / RIGHT TO DISCONNECT”

“DELIVERED.” WHAT DOES THAT EVEN MEAN?

“0-3 to base, 10-4.”

As a courier driver, it meant that I, the driver, had received the message.  And it didn’t matter if I wanted to make that inconvenient pick-up 5 minutes before the end of my shift, I still had the responsibility to do it, convenient or not.

It meant that I had received the message, and accepted the fact that it was now my responsibility to take that action for that customer.  You know, the people who pay my wages.

Often, as I said, it would be inconvenient.  Reichhold Chemicals was like that.  They were in a kind of out-of-the way spot on my route, on Wallace Road, and because of that, I’d plan my run accordingly to try and maximize my efficiency.  So when I made my stop at Reichhold at a little after 4 PM, I could quickly get back into shape to respond to things coming from the city core.

But if they called in for an “Oops, we forgot,” pickup after I’d already been there, it would mean scrambling to get back to them before they closed at 5 PM and bending me out of shape location and time-wise for other customers also closing at 5.

More often than not, that message of “0-3 to base, 10-4” would be followed by a stream of rich, creative profanity that would probably last until I got out of my truck at Reichhold, to be replaced by my corporate sunshine and roses demeanour for the secretary in the office, who happened to be cute.  Pretty shallow shit, but there it is.

Continue reading ““DELIVERED.” WHAT DOES THAT EVEN MEAN?”

AUSTRALIA TO BAN SOCIAL MEDIA FOR KIDS UNDER SIXTEEN

Australia has passed legislation that forbids children under the age of sixteen from having social media accounts.  To be clear, this is not a cellphone ban so far as I currently understand it, but rather something targeted at kids’ ability to sign up for social media accounts in the first place.  I guess the feeling is that, once you take the social media out of the phone, the device just becomes this inert piece of irrelevant technology.

Yeah, right.

In the Australian situation, being monitored breathlessly by provincial governments here in Canada who like to make big noises that have little impact, the gatekeepers, the people responsible for ensuring compliance with the age requirements, are the creators and operators of the social media companies that are being shut out of one of their most lucrative markets.  There’s those damned foxes again, in charge of the gate to the hen house, so to speak.

Continue reading “AUSTRALIA TO BAN SOCIAL MEDIA FOR KIDS UNDER SIXTEEN”

CANADIAN NEWSPAPERS FILE SUIT AGAINST ChatGPT AND OPENAI

It’s come to light that a group of Canadian newspapers have banded together to launch a lawsuit against ChatGPT and OpenAI, two entities that specialize in using artificial intelligence to generate what could be called “creative’ materials.  By creative materials, I speak mostly about text, or writing applications, and artificially-generated images, although the technology will soon expand to include other artistic endeavours, like video, music, and, well, you name it.

These entities are also referred to as large language models, or LLM’s, and get their capabilities from scouring the internet in the most precise detail and “learning” from what they scan, both in terms of content and style, to the point where they can replicate the work of a real person, and do so in seconds.

The implications, and ramifications of this, are huge.  And to a large degree totally unfair to those people and those organizations who generate creative content the old-fashioned way:  through talent, hard work, and much self-sacrifice.

The reason it’s newspapers leading this particular charge is two-fold.

First, it’s been the news media generally that has been stolen from on an egregious scale, victimized by the big tech companies who would allow that original content to be posted and re-posted on their various social media platforms and other platforms.  Given the rise and popularity in social media, it was only a matter of time before the advertising dollars followed suit, the same dollars that newspapers relied on to provide their product and pay their salaries and bills.  After all, when you advertise in a newspaper, your messaging gets thrown in the trash after a day or a week, depending on the type of publication.  When you advertise online, algorithms ensure that your message will remain alive, and pop-up conveniently everywhere a potential consumer may go, since the algorithm has already determined your surfing and interest patterns.  A much better bang for your advertising buck.

The kicker is that the place that created the original content is forced to lay off staff, downsize its operations, or close completely, thereby sniffing out the source of all that creative work.  So there go of all those writers, reporters, graphic artists, editors, and advertising sales people, all victims to voracious American big tech companies who have literally come in and stolen everything from you to fuel their own breath-taking growth.

Continue reading “CANADIAN NEWSPAPERS FILE SUIT AGAINST ChatGPT AND OPENAI”

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑